MLB is basically a fraud right about now

With the latest report that Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz and former Red Sox slugger Manny Ramirez both being on the list of the 100 or so baseball players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), I guess one thing is official: Major League Baseball has become a fraud, and I have no time for it anymore, much like I have no time for pro-wrestling.

The thing that disturbs me the most is that Ortiz, who, along with Ramirez, helped the Boston Red Sox to win two World Series to erase the almost-a-century-old curse, was hard-swinging at New York Yankee third baseman Alex Rodriguez just months ago when it was revealed that Rodriguez was using steroids. Ortiz said he would welcome MLB to test him before, during, and after the season. He was the one who said voluntary testing was not enough; he was the one who said people caught cheating should be suspended for a year. He was the one who said the only thing people can find in his blood were “beans and rice.” He was the one who said he would not take any PEDs because he did not want his children to be taunted by classmates who said their father is a cheater…

Basically, Ortiz, like many other MLBers, was caught in a bunch of lies. And right about now, is there anyone who we can trust in baseball anymore? And, can you honestly look at any achievement in baseball, and not think twice as to whether or not that achievement is legitimate? I certainly cannot.

Some people would suggest that if the entire era is ridden with steroids, then there really was not a problem with an un-level playing field. But unless everyone in MLB was cheating from 1994, that take cannot be valid. If any of the pitchers who faced Ortiz or Ramirez in the two Boston World Series win were clean, then the Red Sox had gotten an unfair advantage, and that fact alone would make those epic championships tainted. No bloody socks from Curt Schilling can completely change that fact.

And that’s the sad part in all this. I am sure there are a good number of players who have been grinding it out, paying the price, to play at the top level. But by now, everyone is pretty well “guilty by association.” If you are one of the Red Sox members from those two championship team, who upset would you be to see people throw an asterisk to your accomplishment?

Which prompts me to wonder why people are still unwilling to break that “code” and take a strong stance against the cheaters in baseball. If my entire legacy is about to be put into question, and I’m completely clean, I would be infuriated. But we don’t see that happening in MLB; at least, not frequently.

If MLB and its players are not willing to distant themselves from the frauds and the cheaters once and for all because it is “good for business,” then I will. As a fan, I have no time for Bobble-head figures launching rockets when I know that most of that is drug-fuelled.

More on the HST

Since my last post on the HST, more information has emerged as to how this new tax would be implemented. The details, however, did not change my stance against this tax one bit.

Against the oppositional voices, the government has outlined several points in defence of the HST. I will first list these points, and then offer my argument against them:

#1 HST rebates will be given to citizens of lower income, much like the GST rebates currently given. There are two serious flaws in the concept of a HST rebate: firstly, people must still pay the tax upfront. For people who are barely earning enough for their everyday needs, receiving a cheque in three months’ time does not assist them in acquiring their daily essentials today. Secondly, as a person who used to collect GST rebate cheques way back in the day, I know the amount does not reflect how much I have spent. For people who are living on a very tight budget, the fact that they know they will receive a set amount of rebate regardless of how much they have spent would decrease their desire to spend. This would harm businesses overall.

#2 Businesses will be saving administrative costs in the billions. I know very little about big businesses and how they operate, so let’s just assume that this claim is true. However, for a corner store owner who handles the bookkeeping and taxes by himself, how does harmonizing the GST and PST save him any administrative money? Increasing that number on the price tag would hurt his business, that’s for sure. What would small businesses gain through this re-structuring of taxes?

#3 B.C. would have the lowest HST rate in Canada. So? Right now, we have 5% GST, and 7% GST. Keep things the way it is, we have to pay a combined 12% for sales taxes. If that is the lowest in Canada (it actually is not – Alberta has no PST, and Saskatchewan has a 5% PST rate, for a combined rate of 5% and 10%, respectively), does the process of harmonization change anything? It doesn’t.

#4 There are exemptions to the HST in areas such as food, books, etc. But the exemptions cover fewer areas than the current PST exemptions. Not all food items we purchase from a supermarket would be PST exempt, so food cost will go up (unless you just buy broccoli and boil it everyday as your food, with no sauces, no spices, and no processed food items to add). You work late one night and need to dine out? Pay 14% HST. Can you imagine the hit restaurants, particularly those low-end, bargain restaurants, would take?

#5 Businesses currently paying a hidden 7% PST would transfer that tax back to the consumers when that hidden tax is removed and replaced by the surface 12% HST. The BC Government has said the money it has received from the federal government to implement the HST will NOT be given to BC residents, so what make anyone believe that big businesses would pass along their savings? Are we that naïve, Mr. Campbell?

The Liberal Government has claimed that, over the years, it has taken steps over the years to make business more competitive, and to reduce taxes. All I know is that, over the last few years, the federal government has lowered the GST from 7% to 6% and then to 5%. Love or hate the Conservatives, they did deliver their election promises. I have not seen the PST reduced at all. I have seen money from lower income families being taken to be given to big businesses and corporations, friends of Mr. Campbell and his friends.

Truth is, the HST is a discriminatory tax that targets people of lower income. At the provincial level, I have not really been supportive of either the Liberals or the NDP, but this latest move by the Liberals have turned me into a definite Liberal-basher. I would sincerely urge you to join the following Facebook group to voice your displeasure against the BC HST:

No BC HST Facebook Group

HST is a Money-grab against the Poor

I haven’t written about news happening at the local front for a while, but this following piece of news REALLY disturbs me:

Vancouver Sun: BC to Harmonize Sales Tax at 12% Next July

Finance Minister Colin Hansen (left) announced today (Thursday, July 23, 2009) that the B.C. Government will combine the federal GST and the provincial PST into one combined sales tax, the harmonized sales tax (HST) starting in July of 2010. Hansen cites that the existing two-sales-tax system is causing businesses a lot of extra accounting work that is bad for business. He estimates that the harmonization process would save businesses 1.9 billion dollars.

What Hansen did not say is the harmonization’s effects on the poor, which prompted me to write the following to all the local newspaper immediately upon hearing this news:

“The BC Government’s proposed plan to “harmonize” the GST and PST into the HST appears on the surface to be a move to promote business. In essence, it is a despicable scheme to take the money away from the poor to pour it into the pockets of the rich. Currently, the poorest of BC’s residents rarely have to pay a sales tax for the province – they do not buy electronics, cars, luxurious vacations, and the like. Groceries, school supplies are among the items that are PST-exempt. By harmonizing the federal and the provincial sale taxes, they would now have to pay an additional 7% when they buy their food, or a set of pencils for their children. Big corporations are ALREADY paying their accountants to handle both the GST and PST; grass-root citizens cannot afford to pay a NEW extra 7% for their life’s essentials, and that is the bottom-line that Mr. Campbell’s government is once again ignoring.”

If enough people are crying foul, I have a feeling the BC Liberals will propose a rebate system where the poor can get some money back for the extra taxes they have to pay on their everyday essentials. However, even if that rebate is a full-scale rebate that covers all of their expenses, it does not take into the account that grass-root citizens are living from pay-cheque to pay-cheque, and cannot really afford to pay that tax up front. Without a choice, people with the lowest income may have to buy less food, live in poorer conditions, and have fewer essential items such as stationary products for school-aged children.

Even with best intentions, it is not difficult to see that the BC Liberal government has its policies catered towards the rich at the expense of the poor. I do not classify myself as a political socialist (far from it, actually), but this repeated oppression of the poor is just despicable.

MJ and ET

These last 10 days, we have been bombarded with news and rumours surround Michael Jackson’s passing. While there is absolutely no doubt that Michael Jackson is a transcendent figure in the world of entertainment, I cannot but remember his later days and all the controversies and allegations. Is Michael Jackson a legend? Absolutely. Is he worth the wailing and crying that we are seeing daily in the news? Unless you are actually related to him biologically or in relationship, I think not.

Just a couple days before MJ’s passing, a far less prominent person by the name of Ed Thomas suffered a tragic death. The news, however, did not receive much media attention. Here's one though, from ABC news.

Ed Thomas was a long-time high school football coach at Aplington-Parkersburg, a small town in Iowa, USA. He has coached for over 40 years, and from his small high school program, he has produced four professional football players, no small feat for a program so small. On the day Mr. Thomas died, he was putting in extra time for his players, gathering them for an extra training session. A former student from his high school stormed the changing room where Mr. Thomas was, and shot him in front of his players.

Mr. Thomas is a big-name person in the state of Iowa not because of his coaching genius, but because of his character as a person. A couple years ago, a tornado basically destroyed this small town in Iowa. While many considered leaving the town, Mr. Thomas urged the people to stay, and used the re-building of the school’s football field as a rallying cry to help the town’s people to move on.

In many ways, I understand why Mr. Thomas is not getting the respect and tribute that Michael Jackson is getting – after all, Mr. Thomas was “just” a high school football coach that worked with these teenagers, and showed them how to live their lives the right way. But, isn’t that exactly the problem we have in this society, that we celebrate the stars, and don’t recognize those who are truly making the true difference, one life at a time?

Rest in peace, Mr. Thomas. You have my utmost respect.

Never to Forget June 4, 1989: Prologue

How old were you twenty years ago? Where were you twenty years ago? If you are somewhat "aged" like me, twenty years ago, you were already a teen (or a "tween") who were old enough to understand some of the conversations that your parents were making, but not quite mature enough to comprehend the scope or the depth to what they were talking about.

Twenty years ago, my parents were working in two separate places: my dad was in Vancouver with us, and my mom was finishing her contract working in Hong Kong. One evening night, our family was having our usual long-distance telephone conversation. My dad, at the time, was asking my mom of what was the latest news that was taking place in Beijing (Peking), China. In one of the most chilling memories I have ever had, my mom replied, "They had opened fire at the protesting students." To this day, I can remember vividly the deadly, frightening silence that followed my mother’s statement.

The June 4 Tiananmen Massacre occurred twenty years ago. Many of you may be too young to remember a whole lot about it; some of you may have never heard about it. However, there are probably a good number of you who are living in North America right now, in part or in whole, because of it. What were the events that took place that led to the final bloody killings of thousands of innocent people? Why are there so many discussions about the event today? What are the arguments of those who feel the event should or shouldn’t be re-examined?
Over the next few days leading up to June 4, I am going to be posting an article that was originally submitted to a magazine to be published. The article was pulled due to political pressure, but since this is a personal blog, I have no fear in posting it to share with you some of the thoughts I have over the events of June 4, 1989. A warning, first of all: some of the images you will see are gruesome. However, I think, that is all the more reason why the henious crime committed by those who were in charge need to be dealt with severely so justice might be served.